Nov 17 IELTS Writing

The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws. Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Laws serve as a tool to regulate and restrain human behavior. The presence of legal frameworks elevates living conditions and streamlines the functioning of society. Conversely, excessive legal regulation may suppress the vitality of economic development and engender issues concerning social stability.

Effective legal regulation tend to propel a society towards higher levels of efficiency. From the government's perspective, laws generally establish the workflows for public matters. For example, when citizens require government assistance to arrange medical insurance, healthcare laws and rules often provide details on coverage and the necessary procedures. Such provisions frequently spares individuals the time spent consulting various sources, and the procedural handling increases governmental operational efficiency, allowing for the rapid service of a larger populace. Moreover, strict enforcement of traffic laws or harsh penalties can significantly improve road efficiency. For example, imposing large fines on drunk drivers compels individuals to avoid driving after consuming alcohol, thereby preventing traffic congestion caused by drunk-driving accidents and avoiding impacts on people's commuting time.

Furthermore, laws can raise the standard of living among the populace, consequently fostering a more harmonious social environment. If not bound by laws, companies might potentially, in an effort to reduce costs, produce counterfeit goods or substandard food products. Additionally, without the deterrent effect of law, the probability of offenses like robbery and theft would rise dramatically, particularly when great profits tempt individuals and crime carries no penalties. The prevalence of criminal incidents would unavoidably provoke mutual fear among people, thus impacting their standard of living.

In opposition, overly stringent laws could reduce the dynamism of economic growth. Within the sphere of social progress, innovation typically demands a looser regulatory environment. For example, if company employees are constrained by complex rules, they regularly dare not do anything beyond what is permitted by those rules; however, innovation often involves breaking previous regulations to achieve greater productivity.. A society devoid of innovation will be unable to discover economic drivers, leading directly to stagnation. Moreover, the authorities' implementation of stricter tax laws will increase corporate expenditures, disrupt the balance of income and expenses, thereby causing companies to lose funds for continuous investment, which contributes to large-scale corporate bankruptcies and triggers an avalanche-like economic recession.

Fundamentally, a judicious legal system is crucial for securing the livelihood of the people and enhancing the trajectory of societal evolution; on the other hand, an overabundance of legal constraints may precipitate economic downturns.